Pension transfers and IHT implications – latest news

In the long running Staveley case, the Supreme Court has finally ruled by a majority vote that the pension transfer made in this case when the transferor was in serious ill-health was not liable to IHT.

In a brief summary of the case: in December 2006, Mrs Staveley died having been in serious ill-health. Shortly before her death, she had transferred funds from her existing pension scheme (a section 32) into a personal pension plan (PPP). She didn’t take any pension benefits at all during her life and, in those circumstances, a death benefit was payable under the PPP.

If you’re not a client, to read this content you must sign up for a free guest account

Clients of threesixty are kept up to speed with the latest regulatory, industry and technical developments via our regular news and opinions articles.

As well as being updated via the articles we publish to threesixty online, clients can specify to us what type of articles they want to receive (by category) and how frequently they receive them.

To try this service, simply register your details with us and we'll give you 3 months free and unlimited access to our news and opinions.